Today we learn that a Monolith is a new vehicle type called a "Heavy Skimmer", as well as some special reserve rules for it. Much more here including the first I have read on the 5 Disciples. So enjoy the read.

Please remember that until the codex is hand, these are still rumors and take with salt. Howeve these are pretty solid.


via Yakface
Crypteks vs. (basic) Lords in the 'Royal Court': both have more like squad leader stats then character stats (1 wound each for example) with both of their base points are in the exact same range as an IG Commissar, for example. However, all of the upgrades for these guys clock in the 5 to 45 point range (each option) with probably a 15 point median for their gear, so you can imagine that these guys will very quickly eat up your points if you give them many (or any) upgrades.

The Lords have access to 4 Weapon upgrade options (Warschythe, Gauntlet of Fire, Hyperphase Sword & Voidblade) and 5 wargear-esque options (Sempirternal Weaev, Mindshackle Scarabs, Tesseract labyrinth, Ressurection Orb & Phase Shifter). Of all those weapons and upgrades only the Rez Orb benefits the unit. The rest of the upgrades just give the Lord extra benefits in combat or armor save.

So really, if you're looking to make the Lord improve a unit by leading it, besides adding some CC punch to the unit your only real choice is the Rez Orb and the Rez Orb is on the high end of the points scale for their wargear so it isn't exactly a steal to get a Rez Orb into a unit (which for those who aren't keeping up boosts their Resurrection Protocols to a 4+).

Crypteks can be taken plain jane if you wanted (with only a Staff of Light), but if you want to upgrade them at all, then you have to select a 'discipline' that they follow. There are five disciplines to pick from and each one costs some amount of points to take, with the only benefit being that you get an upgraded weapon instead of the staff of light that fits into that discipline's role.

The 5 Disciplines are: Harbinger of Destruction (described as 'plasmancers', weapon is Eldritch Lance, wargear choices are Gaze of Flame & Solar Pulse), Harbinger of Eternity (able to read the future, weapon is Aeonstave, weargear choices are Chronometron & Timesplinter Cloak), Harbinger of Transmogrification (described as 'geomancers', weapon is Harp of Dissonance, options are Seismic Cruicble & Tremorstave), Harbringer of the Storm (described as 'ethermancers', weapon is Voltaic Staff, options are Ether Crystal & Lightning Field) & Harbringer of Despair (described as 'psychomancers', weapon is Abyssal Staff, options are Nightmare Shroud & Veil of Darkness).

Now, once you've chosen a discipline to upgrade to, you're allowed to give the Cryptek one (or both) of the listed wargear options. HOWEVER, the rules state that 'each of the wargear options can only be chosen once in each Royal Court'. So the only way you're going to get more than one Veil of Death (for example) is to take a second Royal Court and even then you're only getting a second one. So it does not look like you will be able to spam these items.

Although there are some exceptions, for the most part these wargear options tend to benefit the unit they're leading, or affect enemy units that are trying to do something to the unit. Like giving the unit assault and defensive grenades (Gaze of Flame), you already know about Solar Pulse if you've been reading my posts closely, causing damage on enemy units Deep Striking near or assaulting that Necron unit (Ether Crystal & Lightning Field respectively), reducing one enemy unit's assault move against that Necron unit by D3" (Seismic Crucible), etc. And all of the upgraded Cryptek weapons are ranged weapons.

So in general I think the basic Lord is what you take if you're trying to give the Royal Court some CC punch (or give a unit some CC punch)...besides the obvious Rez Orb choice, of course! Instead, if you're wanting to upgrade your unit to have some unique abilities and a specialty shooting weapon in it, then the Cryptek is the way to go.

C'Tan Shards: Just to be clear (someone asked), the Necrons do not have any kind of 'deal' worked out with the C'Tan shards. It doesn't state how, but they are able to control them somehow (using their super-tech) to basically point them at the enemy and get them to do what they want, but of course in game terms this isn't represented, there's no special 'rage' rule or anything forcing you to play a C'Tan a certain way.

The fluff says that the Necrons are constantly hunting down missing C'Tan shards and trying to imprison them in pocket dimensional prisons. They know that they can never fully destroy a C'Tan (only break them into shards and keep them from forming back together), but of course their fear is that the C'Tans will be able to reform and then take revenge back against the Necrons.

Every indication I get from the codex is that you'll just use the existing models to represent C'Tan shards, because if you think about how they're described now, a 'shard' is really much closer to what the old codex's power-level was for a C'Tan.

As for the 2 'Manifestations of Power' each shard must take, they each cost a different point value (between 10 & 50 points) and you can only have one of each choice in the army no matter how many C'Tan shards you take. There is a wide variety of different things that can be chosen, from powers that are roughly equivalent to some of the special rules that the Deceiver & Nightbringer had access to in the last codex and plenty of new impressive rules as well (such as making all difficult terrain on the table dangerous for the enemy or making one enemy model in base contact have to pass an Initiative test or be removed from the table). 3 of them are shooting attack choices, each obviously quite a different kind of attack than the others.

As awesome as some of this suonds, you have to temper that with the fact that shards are nearly 200 points with no options, and once you factor in the two manifestation upgrades, you're talking about a unit that is somewhere between 200-300 points (depending on which two manifestations you take).

The Night Scythe, Catacomb Command Barge & Doom Scythe are Fast Skimmers (so can move flat-out).

The Ghost Ark, Doomsday Ark & Annihilation Barge are just Skimmers (so no moving flat-out). And yes, there is no reason the embarked models can't fire from the Ghost Ark as well as the vehicle's Gauss Flayer arrays, but remember that embarked vehicles cannot fire when the vehicle moved faster than combat speed (unless they disembark first).

The Monolith is a new vehicle type, a 'heavy' skimmer which means the vehicle can only ever move combat speed but always counts as stationary when firing. Oh, and the Monolith has a rule that says it can only ever Deep Strike in from Reserve.

haroon wrote:
So the monolith Must deep strike? and it doesn't have any rules to keep it from mishapping? That is pretty painful considering how big it is.

No, it can deploy normally, but if it is put into Reserve then it must arrive via Deep Strike.

KarlPedder wrote:
Are the Tomb Spydors still able to be fielded seperatly or do they operate as a unit now?

1-3 form a unit together per FOC taken.

NecronLord3 wrote:
Destroyers are 1-3? WTF? Please tell me they picked up some wounds.
And now Wraiths go to 1-6? So you make one unit useful, and the other useless. Thanks GW.

Destroyers have the same statline and the Heavy Destroyer upgrade just means they upgrade their gun.

However, they have had a considerable drop in points cost, as have many units in the codex. And let's not forget, before Destroyers tended to be the only mid to long-ranged threat in the army. That isn't the case anymore so I'd guess that it won't be quite as big a problem to have the smaller units.

Heavy Gauss Cannon is still the same, but it costs you almost double the (newly reduced) cost of a Destoyer to upgrade to one. Regular Destroyers have the Gauss Cannon, which is now AP3, but only Heavy 2.

Warscythes do not have any built-in shooting weapon.

And a Night Scythe has no weapon options, but comes with a twin-linked Tesla Desructor, which is a fantastic weapon. 24", Assault 4, S7, AP-, Tesla & Arc. 'Tesla' (as always) means that any 'to hit' roll of '6' means TWO additional hits (not sure if this means 3 overall hits per '6' rolled or not...the wording is kind of ambigious, but I'm thinking, that a roll of '6' does equal 3 hits). 'Arc' means that all units (friendly and enemy) within 6" of the target enemy unit suffer D6 S5 AP- hits on a D6 roll of '6'.

So while the AP- of the Tesla Destructor keeps it from being a premiere transport killer, the fact that you can generate all those extra hits if you roll a '6' to hit (and it is a twin-linked weapon) seems really uber-cool.

Sorry, yes the Gauss Cannon & Heavy Gauss Cannon are now Assault weapons as well. Should have mentioned that.

Tomb Blades (jetbikes) do not have any real AT firepower.

Warscythes are just 2-handed +2 Strength power weapons.

Let's not forget that Scarabs only went up a few points and are amazingly potent. If you're going to want to spam anything from the FA section, I'd guess it is them.

They still have 3A (4 on the charge) and are beasts, giving them the typical beast 19-24" assault threat range. That means if there are any enemy immobile or vehicles that didn't move within that range, they are almost certainly dead, as all you need is 30 attacks (8 bases on the charge) and with Entropic attacks each hit reduces a vehicle's armor by 1 on all facings on a 4+. So if you have 30 attacks you'd expect to reduce a vehicle's armor down to 0 (which auto-wrecks it).

And of course even if your Scarab swarm gets whittled down and isn't able to instantly wreck enemy vehicles, they can still totally weaken enemy armor this way to the point where any unit in your army is able to tear it apart with their regular shooting...so I guess what I'm saying is that 30 Scarabs in an army sounds like a great way to turn all your Anti-Infantry units into AT units as well.

Zeratil wrote:
Thanks! If you have the time, what do the particle (Beamer, Caster, Pistol) weapons do?


The Caster is the pistol.

It goes: Particle Caster
Except for the Caster, they're just the 'blast' weapon category for the Necrons (with the blast getting bigger with each type of weapon).

You do know that something hasn't been 'nerfed' when its point value has gone down more than its abilities have been reduced, right? In that case, it has actually been improved, despite the fact that its per-model abilities have been degraded a bit.

And no, Necrons are most certainly not a CC army.






13 Comments:

  1. Nice, I'd be tempted if I hadn't started DE (which I'm still working on).

    And I just wanted to say thanks for the time you put into this blog. The No.1 site for 40k-News!

    PS: You recently mentioned tactica for DE-Anti-Tanks in a comment - perhaps you could just post it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dude keep the updates coming!!! great info

    ReplyDelete
  3. Huge nerf on Destroyers…. after the monolith, I didn't see that one coming.

    How to kill off yet another unit that currently exists heavily in players collections:

    1) Reduce manoeurveability by dropping jetbike status and replace it with Jumo Infantry.

    2) Reduce Offensive capability and make more vulnerable by reducing number of shots and unit size (no one will ever take units of 3 Ha Ha Ha)

    3) Make Heavy Destroyer not viable by placing a heavy points cost on the upgrade.

    4) Make them compete with 'must have' scarabs.

    5) Pretend we're giving something back by making weapons AP3, reduce their cost and give them Preferred Enemy… which is totally useless on a 3man shooty unit with poor intiative and 1 basic attack.

    You can count on GW to dump on players previous collections in order to boost the sells of their new stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Anonymous: The only reason Necron Players have so many of them in their collection is because that was the main viable build for a decent Necron list. With all the new stuff coming, I honestly don't think Destroyer spam will even be necessary. Besides, just enjoy your models and play all Destroyers for a fun game or Apocalypse or something.

    I'm really looking forward to the new book, I'll probably order the codex and a Necron Lord or two!

    Granesh
    Smells Like Wargaming

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Granesh: I can understand a slight nerf or change of rules but these have pretty much killed the destroyer dead. And the way to prevent destroyer spam is making other things just as good so players can choose what style they liked to play.

    I would have dropped a unit of Destroyers anyway so I could have a more variation and new units to play with, so there was no need to totally hit them to death with the nerf bat!

    And if these new 'Tomb Blades' are anti-infantry jetbikes, then what was the gap they had to fill…. when Destroyers already filled that roll. No, they've killed destroyers because they know players already have plenty, so sells are gonna be minimal anyway.

    I was hoping GW had stopped their practice of killing off units in order to focus sells on new stuff with the carnifex but apparently not. The practice is just plain wrong! and flies in the face of the purchases that customers have already spent their money on. It shameful, totally shameful.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Anonymous READ "You do know that something hasn't been 'nerfed' when its point value has gone down more than its abilities have been reduced, right? In that case, it has actually been improved, despite the fact that its per-model abilities have been degraded a bit. "

    AP 3 is AMAZING.

    That almost doubles their chance to get a wound against MEQ. Even taking into account the less attacks.

    I swear some people just WANT something to beech about.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Something to consider...and this is kind of a gimme from GW depending on the number of warriors you bought, but the 'must have' FA unit, scarabs, you should already have in numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "AP 3 is AMAZING"

    The AP for Destroyers was never the issue… their str+rate of fire+unit size took care of MEQ pretty effectively anyway. Both rate of fire reduction (which I could handle) + the signifcant unit size reduction will make them far less effective vs MEQ becuase now you have only a max of 6 shots per unit… say half hit and 2 wound, hoping targets get no cover.

    You only have lose 1 destroer and thats a LD check and if you lose 2 a fail then you're off the board, presuming that the 3 don't go down to mass fire! Units of 5 are/were much more resilient.

    A unit size of 3 Wraiths never worked (hence why they increased it) so why think Destroyers in 3s will. To make them effective you will need to spam them giving you 9 in total but then not having anything else in the FA slots. It was the same for Wraiths, to make them effective you needed at 2 max size units of them at the least.

    Its the unit size that will kill them off! in players lists, regardless of how cheap they might be as 3 is pretty pointless when other more effective units can be taken in the FA slots such as those armour eating scarab swarms.

    And I don't "beech" about stuff for the sake of it… but I see how OTT this nerf is on Destroyers and where it will lead. How many Carnifexes do you see in a typical Tyranid players list these days?

    ReplyDelete
  9. "And I don't "beech" about stuff for the sake of it… but I see how OTT this nerf is on Destroyers and where it will lead. How many Carnifexes do you see in a typical Tyranid players list these days? "

    Bad ones don't take any because the read the hype on message boards posted by the ill-informed.

    Good generals still use them.

    I guess we know which category you fall in.

    And you seem to keep missing the point that they are cheaper now. So 3 Destroyers have a rate of death of about 3.29 MEQ/turn. 5 Old Destoyers had a rate of death of about 2.71 MEQ/turn.

    3.29

    2.71

    With 2 less models.

    And cheaper pts/model.

    And they were NERFED?

    WOW.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Good generals still use them.

    I guess we know which category you fall in."

    And I guess we know what catagory you fall in… a smart a$$ that needs to insult others because he can hide behide the safety of his keyboard.

    In actual play buddy 15 str 6, AP 4 shots are more effective vs 6 str 6, AP 3 shots regardless of your arithmetic. Mass high strength fire… the more dice you throw the greater variation of results you get from 1-6 (in this case 1 and 2s do the job just as well).

    ReplyDelete
  11. "In actual play buddy 15 str 6, AP 4 shots are more effective vs 6 str 6, AP 3 shots regardless of your arithmetic. Mass high strength fire… the more dice you throw the greater variation of results you get from 1-6 (in this case 1 and 2s do the job just as well). "

    If that statement had any validity Orcs would be undefeated in tournaments.

    Math doesn't lie. And eve if we call it a wash, which its not, the point value of the models has DROPPED and the ability to add HD's is HUGE. Your negativity has clouded your judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I do not mind arguements, but two or more anonymous posters calling each other names belongs in certain forums, not here.

    Lets keep the negative comments directed at other posters to a minimum. Its ok to discuss whether you like or dislike the new units.

    ReplyDelete
  13. On the whole I think new codex is looking good and the Hqs appear to have lots of cunning ways to aid ones victory without any OP. HOWEVER I'm totally disapointed with the changes made to the monolith and destroyers! 1) groups of three suck and will be nigh useless and 2) one of my favourite models is now hard to justify points wise. I really don't think this is a move to sell new models in the case of 1) as the scarabs look kick ass! But if it is in the case of 2) all I gotta say is GW its been years since I've had the chance to buy new crons, of course I want to buy the new stuff which looks awesome, nerffing ain't required.

    ReplyDelete

 
Top
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...